Nearly every public health or medical association has shown support for universal helmet laws. I understand the arguments legislators make for freedom, but we live in a society with laws meant to protect the public. As someone who has laid a motorcycle down while riding, I can share with you a small scar on my arm and leg that still show, but I didn’t taste asphalt or even have any long term headache due to a proper DOT approved helmet with a full face shield.
Last week, two pieces of legislation were introduced that are meant to seem innocuous and tourism friendly. Senate Bills 153 & 154 are aimed at repealing laws that require motorcycle riders wear helmets. SB153 will permit riders in West Virignia that have held a motorcycle endorsement on their driver’s license to ride or be a passenger on a motorcycle without wearing a helmet. SB154 permits riders from other states that permit them to ride without a helmet to do so in the Mountain State. It will be called the “Motorcycle Tourism Act of 2020”.
To understand the consequences of such legislation, one shouldn’t look much further than a state a little to our north, Michigan. The University of Michigan Injury Center has studied the repeal of a helmet law and its consequences. The Great Lake State’s legislature introduced a bill in 2012 that partially repealed its universal helmet law for motorcycle riders. The stipulations were for riders over the age of 21 that carried $20,000 in medical insurance and had their motorcycle endorsement for 2 years. Before the repeal, Michiganders’ statewide helmet use was a near perfect 99.4%. Shortly after, it noticeably dropped to 75%. The lowest rates of helmet use (45%) were those who were found to be intoxicated.
Motorcycle related head injuries increased following the repeal and affected 50% of crash-involved riders seeking trauma care, including a greater percentage with skull fractures. The need for neurosurgical procedures almost doubled. According to the UofM Injury Center, riding without a helmet doubled the odds of a head injury and fatality. They also studied the financial implications. Roughly 1/3 of riders involved in crashes have public insurance such as Medicaid , are self payers, or are uninsured. The cost for accident related health care for non-helmeted riders is about 35% more than those riding with a helmet. This means that taxpayers will be paying the unnecessary burden in a time when we cannot afford to pay it.
I am advising the members of the West Virignia Legislature to not support this bill. Will you contact your legislator to tell them to keep motorcycle riders safe?
I remember as a child, my first grade teacher had the door of our class room at Chelyan Elementary decorated with cartoon like pictures of an old man standing next to a baby. The imagery was to show the comparison between the old and new years. 1982 wasn’t a particularly good year for me as I had lost my grandfather in December, so the idea of a new start hit me even as a 6 year old.
Every year, we celebrate the seemingly arbitrary beginning of the Julian calendar, which is a relic of the Roman Empire and Julius Caesar. January 1st or New Year’s Day for some is just another day. For many, it can be a new beginning in so many things. People everywhere resolve to be wealthier, healthier, happier, and better for the new year. Far too often, those resolutions go by the wayside within weeks of the new year. People give up on the budget, the new diet, fall into traps that get in the way of their happiness and feel lesser because of it. This year I have a few goals of my own. While trying to be healthier and happier, I hope to just realize how blessed I am each day.
Thank you to those of you who read these posts, listen to the Appalachian Health Podcast, or watch Live Healthy, Live Well, West Virginia. I hope the material I cover with friends, colleagues, and guests will enrich someone this year. With a little divine intervention, everyone reading this will be a little richer, a little healthier, a little happier, and a little better. Here’s to a great 2020. Happy New Year.
In the above diagram, if you look at the left, it shows that policies & programs can influence health factors which will then influence health outcomes. At the top, health outcomes are basically half and half length of life and quality of life. We all want to have longer more fulfilling lives. The thing thats missing from this is that there should be another arrow atop health outcomes. It should say cost, because better outcomes can mean lower costs to healthcare.
The factors portion is what’s interesting. Only about 10% of factors comes from the physical environment. In West Virignia we really get beat up on rankings of housing and transportation because we are a rural community and have a lot of poverty.
The next section is social & economic factors. This is 40% of the factor scores. Educated citizens make better choices. We should all make certain physical education & health classes are taught at a young age and continued throughout the K-12 education for our youth. It might not hurt to bring home economics back either. Family & social support and community safety make up the rest of this. There is nothing you can substitute for family & social support or for community safety. Any investment in these will eventually lead to better outcomes. And remember, better outcomes means lower costs.
Clinical care is only 20%. Access to care is driven a great deal by employers providing health insurance and other benefits like sick leave. Quality of care is up to providers. We are fortunate in West Virginia to have some truly high quality providers in such a small rural state.
The last block you see going up is health behaviors. It is 30%. If you use tobacco, investment in a cessation program will pay you back. Diet and exercise are also big drivers. Having a limited use of alcohol and limiting drug use can help tremendously. If you are sexually active, and not in a monogamous relationship there are risks that you may be taking. Talking with your healthcare provider about the risks and how to mitigate them may save you from certain sexually transmitted infections.
More than half of the factors listed above are things you can help your employees with. This investment in their health will pay dividends. Keep in mind these are long term investments and they don’t happen over night.
If you’re further interested in how these are calculated or how your community is graded versus the rest of West Virginia or the rest of the county, go to https://www.countyhealthrankings.org and you can see the data in an easy to use format.
In 1962, economist Selma Mushkin discussed the additions to our economy by investments in health. She discussed the effect of a reduction in the death rate on the rate of economic growth from advances in healthcare. Fast forward to today. The United States spends more than any other developed country on healthcare, however life expectancy at birth is 2 to 3 years lower. Any other investments that we make, we look at the dividend paid or the final yield and wonder are we better off than where we began. Why don’t we look at our investments in healthcare?
Healthcare further complicates itself as a business. There is a third party in most of the transactions and contracts. The third party in this transaction is your health insurance. They negotiate rates with the employer, or more often tell the employer what they’ll pay. Then the insurance company will negotiate rates with the health care organization that has the supply.
Being able to change insurance companies every year, means that insurance companies see no high value investments in your health. In their eyes, they may see an investment they make in your long term health could mean that their competitor will receive the dividend. As patients regularly change payers, any individual third party payer has less incentive to commit to any expensive, high value treatment, as the result may mean their competition will reap the reward. I don’t blame them for this. Often Medicaid programs and sometimes small insurers will say that short term budget constraints keep them from paying for high value therapies.
Hospital costs are up, healthcare administration costs are up, diagnostic costs are up, pharmaceutical costs are up, and insurance companies have less incentive to control long term costs and make you healthy. Some people have even said this was a large driver of the opioid crisis. For example, third party payers would pay for an opioid prescription in lieu of physical therapy for an injured patient, because the negotiated rate on the 30 day supply of an opioid was much cheaper than 6 weeks of physical therapy, though PT may have been the answer. We’ve seen multiple pieces of legislation across the country addressing this very issue.
So, the question I get asked the most about is “Is single payer the right strategy for our country?”. People have very strong views about healthcare. I recall working in the Governor’s office when the Affordable Care Act was passed. We had people calling in droves to the switch board telling us to keep our government hands out of their Medicare. They didn’t understand that Medicare is government healthcare and the Governor had little control over it. The bottom line is, no matter what the democrats tend to trot out, I see neither an economic model, nor a political environment where that will work. Further, we have gone down this road for so long, I can’t imagine the federal government destroying entire companies to replace them with a federalized healthcare system similar to European models.
The next step in healthcare reforms will be focusing on value based healthcare and perhaps eventually capitation in health plans. Third party payers are going to do everything possible to limit their share of the risk involved in healthcare. The best advice anyone can get from this is to take care of his or her own health. Its the only way you can guarantee some modicum of lower healthcare costs in the near future.